Furey:
Back to Ignatieff: “But why did I want power in the first place? I had almost no sense of political vocation, and I certainly didn’t have a good answer to the question of why I wanted to hold high office. What drew me most was the chance to stop being a spectator.”
Which is something that Iggy telegraphed to both casual and serious observers of the political scene. Vote for me because I'm smarter than everyone else isn't really an election pitch. Nor is asking voters to cast their ballots for a man simply because he's more photogenic than the alternative. But for Justin Trudeau it might just work.
People dislike leaders who look to be show-offs. This is why Brian Mulroney was so comprehensively loathed. Despite a fairly strong record of governance the man is still more hated than PET, whose sixteen years at the top nearly wrecked the country. But Mulroney came off as a nouveau riche poseur and Pierre Le Grande projected the image of a bohemian aristocrat. The former tried too hard and the latter didn't seem to have to try.
Stephen Harper had a clear idea of why he wanted to become Prime Minister. It's just that the idea shrank in size over the years. From quasi-libertarian vision to modestly conservative manager of the welfare and regulatory state. His personality is that of an aloof wonk. The badly coiffed one, however, was shrewd enough to mask his intelligence and lack of empathy in a style so bland it could be used to make cubicles.
Iggy lacked the political instincts to make himself boring. His political acting skills ranged from feigned outrage to feigned interest. The overall package was disingenious. The real Michael Grant Ignatieff might have made a fine cabinet minister in Britain a few generations back, when the odd intellectual could sneak into high office. Our culture is too vulgarized to accept ideas that cannot be condensed into a soundbite. The real Iggy never speaks in anything less than long and detailed paragraphs. A dumber and more dishonest man might have gone further. That's more a comment on us than him.
Yet Iggy must still bear the burden of his failure. He failed because he was vain. We are all vain in some way. The skill of a good con-man is telling people what they want to hear. A few smooth Liberal operators recruited Iggy to run for office. They told him that Canada needed a smart guy like him. Who doesn't like being flattered? Who doesn't imagine in their mind that they are Horatius at the bridge? Vanity. All is vanity.
That is the ultimate temptation of politics, it's final sin. The vanity of politicians who believe that power is a substitute for governance and well earned pride. The vanity of an electorate who believe they can get something for nothing. Skill, talent and vision are nothing when compared to "vanity, insatiate cormorant."
Recent Comments